First Russian Insurance Company v. Beha
148 N.E. 722, 240 N.Y. 601, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 833
Opinions
The considerations which lead to a reversal in the case of Russian Reinsurance Co. v. Bankers Trust Company, decided herewith (240 N. Y. 149), are not presented by the record in this case. The continued existence' of the corporation and the authority of the directors are conclusively established by the findings which have been unanimously affirmed. The defendant holds the property and is sued as an officer of the State and there is no danger of recovery against him in another jurisdiction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
First Russian Insurance Company v. Beha, 148 N.E. 722, 240 N.Y. 601, 1925 N.Y. LEXIS 833 (N.Y. 1925).
148 N.E. 722 (First Russian Insurance Company v. Beha) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. President & Directors of Manhattan Co.
12 N.E.2d 518 (New York Court of Appeals, 1938)
M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.
186 N.E. 679 (New York Court of Appeals, 1933)
Matter of People (Russian Reinsurance Co.)
175 N.E. 114 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Fred S. James & Co. v. Rossia Insurance Co. of America
160 N.E. 364 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Matter of People (Norske Lloyd Ins. Co.)
151 N.E. 159 (New York Court of Appeals, 1926)
First Russian Insurance Company v. Beha
148 N.E. 740 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)