FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro

971 So. 2d 986, 2008 WL 62464
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 2, 2008
Docket3D07-1114
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 971 So. 2d 986 (FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro, 971 So. 2d 986, 2008 WL 62464 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

971 So.2d 986 (2008)

FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC., Appellant,
v.
Ivan B. CASTRO and Ana H. Castro, Appellee.

No. 3D07-1114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 2, 2008.

David S. Harris, for appellant.

Ralph Ventura, for appellee.

Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On the record before us, we cannot find that the order denying the appellant's motion to vacate default and default judgment constitutes a gross abuse of discretion. See Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bailey v. Deebold, 351 So.2d 355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp.
75 So. 3d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Postell v. State
971 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
971 So. 2d 986, 2008 WL 62464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-response-group-inc-v-castro-fladistctapp-2008.