FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro

971 So. 2d 986, 2008 WL 62464
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 2, 2008·No. 3D07-1114·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

971 So.2d 986 (2008)

FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC., Appellant,
v.
Ivan B. CASTRO and Ana H. Castro, Appellee.

No. 3D07-1114.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

January 2, 2008.

David S. Harris, for appellant.

Ralph Ventura, for appellee.

Before GREEN, SHEPHERD, and SALTER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

On the record before us, we cannot find that the order denying the appellant's motion to vacate default and default judgment constitutes a gross abuse of discretion. See Schwab & Co., Inc. v. Breezy Bay, Inc., 360 So.2d 117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Bailey v. Deebold, 351 So.2d 355 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977). We therefore affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro, 971 So. 2d 986, 2008 WL 62464 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

971 So. 2d 986 (FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp.
75 So. 3d 338 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Postell v. State
971 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)