Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp.
75 So. 3d 338, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17793, 2011 WL 5375021
Opinion
On the record before us, we cannot find that the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s objection to sale and motion to vacate default final judgment constitutes a gross abuse of discretion. See First Response Grp., Inc. v. Castro, 971 So.2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp., 75 So. 3d 338, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17793, 2011 WL 5375021 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
75 So. 3d 338 (Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro
971 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)