Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp.
75 So. 3d 338, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17793, 2011 WL 5375021
This text of 75 So. 3d 338 (Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Croston v. Yale Mortgage Corp., 75 So. 3d 338, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17793, 2011 WL 5375021 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
Opinion
On the record before us, we cannot find that the trial court’s order denying the appellant’s objection to sale and motion to vacate default final judgment constitutes a gross abuse of discretion. See First Response Grp., Inc. v. Castro, 971 So.2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008). We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
FIRST RESPONSE GROUP, INC. v. Castro
971 So. 2d 986 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 So. 3d 338, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17793, 2011 WL 5375021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/croston-v-yale-mortgage-corp-fladistctapp-2011.