First Nationwide Bank, Inc. v. Felberman

236 A.D.2d 361, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1035
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.D.2d 361 (First Nationwide Bank, Inc. v. Felberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
First Nationwide Bank, Inc. v. Felberman, 236 A.D.2d 361, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1035 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Leah Felberman appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Meehan, J.), entered January 17, 1996, which denied her motion to set aside a foreclosure sale. Justice Rosenblatt has been substituted for the late Justice Hart (see, 22 NYCRR 670.1 [c]).

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs; and it is further,

Ordered that counsel for the respective parties are directed to submit affirmations to this Court on or before March 4,1997, on the issue of the imposition of appropriate sanctions, if any, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c), against the appellant and/or her attorney.

To the extent the appellant contends that the foreclosure sale was conducted in violation of her due process rights and the automatic stay provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code (see, 11 USC § 362), she is collaterally estopped from re-litigating those issues which were previously decided against her in the United States Bankruptcy Court (see, Kaufman v Eli Lilly & Co., 65 NY2d 449, 455).

Further, there is no merit to her contention that the notice of the foreclosure sale was defective. Notice was properly published and posted in accordance with RPAPL 231 (2) (a) and (b) and the judgment of foreclosure and sale.

[362]*362The appellant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review.

Finally, the conduct of the appellant and her attorney raise the possibility that they may be subject to sanctions pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c). Rosenblatt, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Nationwide Bank, Inc. v. Felberman
239 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 A.D.2d 361, 654 N.Y.S.2d 328, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1035, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-nationwide-bank-inc-v-felberman-nyappdiv-1997.