First National Bank v. Pinson

105 Ala. 588
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 15, 1894·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

HEAD, J.

Section 2739 of the Code, which requires a dismissal of the suit, in actions upon monied demands, where the recovery is for less than the sum of which the court has jurisdiction, unless the prescribed affidavit is made, applies to all actions ex contractu. King v. Parmer, 34 Ala. 416, by a divided court, excepted from the operation of the statute actions for torts. It will not bear any further exception.—McClure v. Lay, 30 Ala. 208; Mills v. Long, 58 Ala. 460. The affidavit required is prescribed in very plain terms. It must state that the amount sued for is actually due. We have no authority to add to or take from the statute requirement.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First National Bank v. Pinson, 105 Ala. 588 (Ala. 1894).

105 Ala. 588 (First National Bank v. Pinson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. Lawler
104 So. 412 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1925)
Woodward Iron Co. v. Keller
74 So. 933 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
Bullock v. Mason
69 So. 882 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)
Black v. Ryan
69 So. 633 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1915)