Bethune v. Oates

58 Ala. 460
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 Ala. 460 (Bethune v. Oates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bethune v. Oates, 58 Ala. 460 (Ala. 1877).

Opinion

BBICKELL, 0. J.

The decree may, so far as it entitles the appellee to priority of payment, over the mortgage to Mrs. John, depart from the agreement of the parties, and if she was complaining the error would perhaps compel a reversal. But she did not join in the appeal, nor in the assignment of errors. The mortgagors are the only parties appellant, and they are bound for the payment of the debt to the appellee, and the mortgage debt to Mrs. John, and have no interest in the matter of priority of right to chafge the lands. In any event, as to them, the lands are subject to the payment of both debts, and they are not injured, and can not be, by according priority to either debt. A party is not allowed to obtain a reversal because of errors not injurious to him. The decree is affirmed as to the appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank v. Pinson
105 Ala. 588 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 Ala. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bethune-v-oates-ala-1877.