First National Bank of Chicago v. Department of Treasury

Michigan Supreme Court

First National Bank of Chicago v. Department of Treasury

764 N.W.2d 572, 483 Mich. 1000

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 2009·No. 137527·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff assignee of the mortgage on the property in question had standing to assert the due process rights of its assignor, which was formerly known as BankBoston, NA; and, if so, (2) whether BankBoston’s due process rights were violated by the defendants’ mailing of notice to FNB — the entity into which BankBoston had merged and to which it had changed its name — at FNB’s address, rather than to the Boston address listed on BankBoston’s mortgage assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff assignee of the mortgage on the property in question had standing to assert the due process rights of its assignor, which was formerly known as BankBoston, NA; and, if so, (2) whether BankBoston’s due process rights were violated by the defendants’ mailing of notice to FNB — the entity into which BankBoston had merged and to which it had changed its name — at FNB’s address, rather than to the Boston address listed on BankBoston’s mortgage assignment.

First National Bank of Chicago v. Department of Treasury, 764 N.W.2d 572, 483 Mich. 1000 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

764 N.W.2d 572 (First National Bank of Chicago v. Department of Treasury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related