Alley v. SECK, DO

764 N.W.2d 572, 2009 WL 1270398
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 2009·No. 137412·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

764 N.W.2d 572 (2009)

Franklin ALLEY and Janet Alley, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Frank SECK, D.O., and Cedar Avenue Family Practice, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 137412. COA No. 283634.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 7, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 22, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Holman v. Rasak (Docket No. 137993) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Alley v. SECK, DO, 764 N.W.2d 572, 2009 WL 1270398 (Mich. 2009).

764 N.W.2d 572 (Alley v. SECK, DO) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First National Bank of Chicago v. Department of Treasury
764 N.W.2d 572 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)