Alley v. SECK, DO

764 N.W.2d 572, 2009 WL 1270398
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 7, 2009
Docket137412
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 N.W.2d 572 (Alley v. SECK, DO) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alley v. SECK, DO, 764 N.W.2d 572, 2009 WL 1270398 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

764 N.W.2d 572 (2009)

Franklin ALLEY and Janet Alley, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Frank SECK, D.O., and Cedar Avenue Family Practice, Defendants-Appellants.

Docket No. 137412. COA No. 283634.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 7, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 22, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Holman v. Rasak (Docket No. 137993) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First National Bank of Chicago v. Department of Treasury
764 N.W.2d 572 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.W.2d 572, 2009 WL 1270398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alley-v-seck-do-mich-2009.