First National Bank in Duncan v. Wallace

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

First National Bank in Duncan v. Wallace

1940 OK 461, 107 P.2d 536, 188 Okla. 183, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 417

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 19, 1940

DocketNo. 29388.

StatusPublished

This text of 1940 OK 461 (First National Bank in Duncan v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

First National Bank in Duncan v. Wallace, 1940 OK 461, 107 P.2d 536, 188 Okla. 183, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 417 (Okla. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court entered on a garnishment proceeding. A motion to quash and dissolve the garnishment was filed, and thereupon, upon due consideration, an order was entered on February 24, 1939, dissolving said garnishment. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed August 8, 1939. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that under section 555, O. S. 1931, 12 Okla. St. Ann. § 983, an order which dissolves a garnishment can only be reviewed where the appeal is taken within 30 days from the date of the order. The appeal must be dismissed under the rule announced in Security Bldg. & Loan Ass’n of Oklahoma City v. Ward, 174 Okla. 238, 50 P. 2d 651; Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. Adams, 87 Okla. 291, 211 P. 79. These cases, after reiterating the rule announced above with regard to attachment, also hold that the same rule is applicable in an appeal from an order which discharges a garnishment.

Appeal dismissed.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and OSBORN, HURST, and NEFF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court entered on a garnishment proceeding. A motion to quash and dissolve the garnishment was filed, and thereupon, upon due consideration, an order was entered on February 24, 1939, dissolving said garnishment. The petition in error with case-made attached was filed August 8, 1939. A motion to dismiss has been filed for the reason that under section 555, O. S. 1931, 12 Okla. St. Ann. § 983, an order which dissolves a garnishment can only be reviewed where the appeal is taken within 30 days from the date of the order. The appeal must be dismissed under the rule announced in Security Bldg. & Loan Ass’n of Oklahoma City v. Ward, 174 Okla. 238, 50 P. 2d 651; Berry-Beall Dry Goods Co. v. Adams, 87 Okla. 291, 211 P. 79. These cases, after reiterating the rule announced above with regard to attachment, also hold that the same rule is applicable in an appeal from an order which discharges a garnishment.

Appeal dismissed.

BAYLESS, C. J., WELCH, V. C. J., and OSBORN, HURST, and NEFF, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1940 OK 461, 107 P.2d 536, 188 Okla. 183, 1940 Okla. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/first-national-bank-in-duncan-v-wallace-okla-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack