First Carolina's Joint-Stock Land Bank, Inc. v. Stewart

179 S.E. 463, 208 N.C. 139, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 343
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 10, 1935·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

CoNnoe, J.

The matters contained in the allegations in the further answer of the defendants, which were stricken out, on the motion of the plaintiff, do not constitute a defense to the cause of action alleged in the complaint. They are, therefore, immaterial and irrelevant, and were *140 properly stricken from tbe answer. C. S., 537. They were material and relevant only on the motion to confirm the sale of the land conveyed by the deed of trust, which was duly reported to the clerk of the Superior Court of Beaufort County, and confirmed by him. O. S., 2591. This sale is not subject to collateral attack in this action.

It would seem from the allegations in their answer that the defendants were dealt with harshly by the plaintiff, but the Court is without power to give them relief in this action. The plaintiff does not in this action invoke the equitable powers of the Court. It is content to have only its legal remedy. The order must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

First Carolina's Joint-Stock Land Bank, Inc. v. Stewart, 179 S.E. 463, 208 N.C. 139, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 343 (N.C. 1935).

179 S.E. 463 (First Carolina's Joint-Stock Land Bank, Inc. v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thompson v. Pilot Life Insurance
67 S.E.2d 444 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Parrish v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
221 N.C. 292 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Parrish v. . R. R.
20 S.E.2d 299 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1942)
Morton v. Commissioner
38 B.T.A. 534 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1938)
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Robertson
187 S.E. 575 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)