Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
60 Cust. Ct. 992, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2899
United States Customs Court·Decided January 29, 1968·No. No. P68/31; protests 64/24019, etc. (New York)·Published
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of draAvtwisters and parts thereof, which are dedicated to use on or with such machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline Division, and Alltransport, Inc., et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 992, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2899 (cusc 1968).
60 Cust. Ct. 992 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allied Chemical Corp. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 233 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)
Allied Chemical Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 880 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)