Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States

60 Cust. Ct. 992, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2899

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 29, 1968

DocketNo. P68/31; protests 64/24019, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 60 Cust. Ct. 992 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States, 60 Cust. Ct. 992, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2899 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of draAvtwisters and parts thereof, which are dedicated to use on or with such machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline Division, and Alltransport, Inc., et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of draAvtwisters and parts thereof, which are dedicated to use on or with such machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline Division, and Alltransport, Inc., et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 Cust. Ct. 992, 1968 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestone-tire-rubber-co-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack