Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 871, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1770

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 20, 1967

DocketNo. P67/247

StatusPublished

This text of 59 Cust. Ct. 871 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 871, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1770 (cusc 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the mer-

chandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of drawtwister machines and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline Division, and Alltransport, Inc., et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the mer-

chandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of drawtwister machines and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline Division, and Alltransport, Inc., et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 Cust. Ct. 871, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firestone-tire-rubber-co-v-united-states-cusc-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack