Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 871, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1770
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the mer-
chandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of drawtwister machines and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Allied Chemical Corp., National Aniline Division, and Alltransport, Inc., et al. v. United States (53 Cust. Ct. 233, Abstract 68680, and 56 Cust. Ct. 880, Abstract 69811), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 871, 1967 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1770 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 871 (Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allied Chemical Corp. v. United States
53 Cust. Ct. 233 (U.S. Customs Court, 1964)
Allied Chemical Corp. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 880 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)