Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate Insurance

46 A.D.3d 560, 846 N.Y.S.2d 636
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 4, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 46 A.D.3d 560 (Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Allstate Insurance, 46 A.D.3d 560, 846 N.Y.S.2d 636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to confirm two arbitration awards, Allstate Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated September 8, 2006, which, upon an order of the same [561]*561court dated November 30, 2005, in effect, granting the petition and denying its cross motion to vacate the awards, is in favor of the petitioner and against it in the principal sum of $36,274.86.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

An award in a compulsory arbitration proceeding may be upheld if it has evidentiary support and is not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 214, 223 [1996]; Matter of DiNapoli v Peak Automotive, Inc., 34 AD3d 674 [2006]; Matter of Eagle Ins. Co. v First Cardinal Corp., 8 AD3d 483 [2004]).

Contrary to the contention of Allstate Insurance Company (hereinafter Allstate), the subject arbitration awards directing it to reimburse the petitioner insurance company for payment of no-fault benefits was not arbitrary and capricious. It is undisputed that Allstate failed to timely file a written answer, and that its answer and accompanying evidentiary submissions were thus rejected by the arbitrator. Furthermore, there is no indication in the record that Allstate offered the arbitrator any explanation for its failure to submit a timely answer, and no representative of the company appeared at the arbitration hearing to offer evidence. Under these circumstances, we cannot conclude that the arbitrator’s refusal to consider the lack of coverage defense asserted in Allstate’s untimely answer was arbitrary and capricious. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly confirmed the arbitration awards in favor of the petitioner. Spolzino, J.E, Krausman, Garni and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v. Westchester Med. Group, M.D.
125 A.D.3d 649 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Allstate Insurance v. New York Petroleum Ass'n Compensation Trust
104 A.D.3d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Mercury Casualty Co. v. Healthmakers Medical Group, P.C.
67 A.D.3d 1017 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
American Express Property Casualty Co. v. Vinci
63 A.D.3d 1055 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Mangano v. United States Fire Insurance
55 A.D.3d 916 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Progressive Casualty Insurance v. New York State Insurance Fund
47 A.D.3d 633 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.3d 560, 846 N.Y.S.2d 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firemans-fund-insurance-v-allstate-insurance-nyappdiv-2007.