Eagle Insurance v. First Cardinal Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Eagle Insurance v. First Cardinal Corp.

8 A.D.3d 483, 778 N.Y.S.2d 309, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8427

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 483 (Eagle Insurance v. First Cardinal Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Eagle Insurance v. First Cardinal Corp., 8 A.D.3d 483, 778 N.Y.S.2d 309, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8427 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Covello, J.), dated July 31, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Sari M. Friedman, P.C. v Gleeson, 300 AD2d 404 [2002]; see also Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 214, 223 [1996]). Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the arbitration panel’s determination was supported by the evidence in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., supra). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to vacate an arbitration award, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Covello, J.), dated July 31, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

An arbitration award in a mandatory arbitration proceeding will be upheld if it is supported by the evidence and is not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Sari M. Friedman, P.C. v Gleeson, 300 AD2d 404 [2002]; see also Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 89 NY2d 214, 223 [1996]). Contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the arbitration panel’s determination was supported by the evidence in the record and was not arbitrary and capricious (see Matter of Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., supra). Santucci, J.P., S. Miller, Schmidt and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.3d 483, 778 N.Y.S.2d 309, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/eagle-insurance-v-first-cardinal-corp-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack