Firbe Optic Plus, Inc. v. Xl Specialty Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Firbe Optic Plus, Inc. v. Xl Specialty Insurance Company

12 A.3d 1003, 300 Conn. 907, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 42

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 1, 2011·No. SC 18741·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the defendants American Networks International, LLC, and Semac Electric Company, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 125 Conn. App. 399 (AC 30366), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court rendered judgment within the time constraints set forth in General Statutes § 51-183b?”

ROGERS, C. J., and EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. *908 Campbell D. Barrett and Jon T. Kukueka, in support of the petition. James H. Howard, in opposition. Decided February 1, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants American Networks International, LLC, and Semac Electric Company, Inc., for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 125 Conn. App. 399 (AC 30366), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court rendered judgment within the time constraints set forth in General Statutes § 51-183b?”

ROGERS, C. J., and EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. *908 Campbell D. Barrett and Jon T. Kukueka, in support of the petition. James H. Howard, in opposition. Decided February 1, 2011

Firbe Optic Plus, Inc. v. Xl Specialty Insurance Company, 12 A.3d 1003, 300 Conn. 907, 2011 Conn. LEXIS 42 (Colo. 2011).

Pincite

12 A.3d 1003 (Firbe Optic Plus, Inc. v. Xl Specialty Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related