Finn v. Kiernan
9 Conn. Super. Ct. 70
Opinion
The plaintiff moves for a default for failure to file answer. The defendant is not in default. The motion of the plaintiff for leave to amend was granted January 12, 1940, but no amendment has been filed.
The position of the defendant is technically correct.
"The granting of a motion to amend does not in itself constitute an amendment." Motiejaitis vs. Johnson,
Motion for default denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Finn v. Kiernan, 9 Conn. Super. Ct. 70 (Colo. Ct. App. 1940).
9 Conn. Super. Ct. 70 (Finn v. Kiernan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Motiejaitis v. Johnson
169 A. 606 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1933)