Finn v. Kiernan

Connecticut Superior Court

Finn v. Kiernan

9 Conn. Super. Ct. 70

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedDecember 13, 1940

DocketFile No. 57893

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Conn. Super. Ct. 70 (Finn v. Kiernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finn v. Kiernan, 9 Conn. Super. Ct. 70 (Colo. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

The plaintiff moves for a default for failure to file answer. The defendant is not in default. The motion of the plaintiff for leave to amend was granted January 12, 1940, but no amendment has been filed.

The position of the defendant is technically correct.

"The granting of a motion to amend does not in itself constitute an amendment." Motiejaitis vs. Johnson, 117 Conn. 631,638.

Motion for default denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiff moves for a default for failure to file answer. The defendant is not in default. The motion of the plaintiff for leave to amend was granted January 12, 1940, but no amendment has been filed.

The position of the defendant is technically correct.

"The granting of a motion to amend does not in itself constitute an amendment." Motiejaitis vs. Johnson, 117 Conn. 631,638.

Motion for default denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Conn. Super. Ct. 70, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finn-v-kiernan-connsuperct-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack