Findley v. Warren
94 A. 69, 248 Pa. 315, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 568
Opinion
The majority of the court are of opinion that the court below properly held that the claim of the appellants was subject to the statute of limitations. On the question as to whether the proper measure of damages was applied, the six members of the court who heard this appeal, are equally divided. The decree is, therefore, affirmed, with costs to the appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Findley v. Warren, 94 A. 69, 248 Pa. 315, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 568 (Pa. 1915).
94 A. 69 (Findley v. Warren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baily Petition
76 A.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Rosamond
1941 OK 410 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate
76 P.2d 167 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Rosenberger v. Kuesel
140 A. 860 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)