Findley v. Warren
94 A. 69, 248 Pa. 315, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 568
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 1, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 197
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 94 A. 69 (Findley v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Findley v. Warren, 94 A. 69, 248 Pa. 315, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 568 (Pa. 1915).
Opinion
The majority of the court are of opinion that the court below properly held that the claim of the appellants was subject to the statute of limitations. On the question as to whether the proper measure of damages was applied, the six members of the court who heard this appeal, are equally divided. The decree is, therefore, affirmed, with costs to the appellees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Baily Petition
76 A.2d 645 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1950)
Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Rosamond
1941 OK 410 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1941)
Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate
76 P.2d 167 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)
Rosenberger v. Kuesel
140 A. 860 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
94 A. 69, 248 Pa. 315, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/findley-v-warren-pa-1915.