Home/California Court of Appeal/Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate

Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate

76 P.2d 166, 24 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 986
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 27, 1938
DocketCiv. No. 5929
StatusPublished

This text of 76 P.2d 166 (Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate, 76 P.2d 166, 24 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 986 (Cal. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

THE COURT.

For the reasons stated in the opinion filed this day in Civil No. 5927 (ante, p. 587 [76 Pac. (2d) 167]), the order of the trial court sustaining the respondents’ demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint, without leave to amend, must be held erroneous, and the judgment of dismissal in said action reversed and the cause is hereby remitted to the trial court with directions to overrule the defendants’ demurrer, granting leave to the plaintiff to file an amended complaint, if so advised, and also granting leave to the respondents to file an answer to plaintiff’s complaint within such reasonable time as the court may deem just.

A petition by respondents to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on March 28, 1938.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alphonzo E. Bell Corp. v. Bell View Oil Syndicate
76 P.2d 167 (California Court of Appeal, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 P.2d 166, 24 Cal. App. 2d 748, 1938 Cal. App. LEXIS 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alphonzo-e-bell-corp-v-bell-view-oil-syndicate-calctapp-1938.