Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority

107 S.W.3d 174, 353 Ark. 356, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 291

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 22, 2003

Docket02-1197

StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.W.3d 174 (Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance Authority, 107 S.W.3d 174, 353 Ark. 356, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 291 (Ark. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellants, William B. Finagin and Gloria Finagin et al., by and through their attorneys, John P. Gill and Richard L. Lawrence, have filed a motion to supplement their abstract, which we will treat as a motion for substituted brief, and for a stay of the time required to file their reply brief. We grant appellants’ motions.

Pursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(l) (2003) of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court, we hereby grant.appellants fifteen days within which to file a substituted abstract, Addendum, and brief. As appellee has already filed its brief, appellee will then be afforded fifteen additional days, after appellants have filed their substituted abstract, Addendum, and brief, to revise or supplement its brief, at the expense of appellants’ counsel. Appellants will then be afforded five days to file their reply brief.

Motions granted.

Corbin, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellants, William B. Finagin and Gloria Finagin et al., by and through their attorneys, John P. Gill and Richard L. Lawrence, have filed a motion to supplement their abstract, which we will treat as a motion for substituted brief, and for a stay of the time required to file their reply brief. We grant appellants’ motions.

Pursuant to Rule 4-2(b)(l) (2003) of the Arkansas Rules of the Supreme Court, we hereby grant.appellants fifteen days within which to file a substituted abstract, Addendum, and brief. As appellee has already filed its brief, appellee will then be afforded fifteen additional days, after appellants have filed their substituted abstract, Addendum, and brief, to revise or supplement its brief, at the expense of appellants’ counsel. Appellants will then be afforded five days to file their reply brief.

Motions granted.

Corbin, J., not participating.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

107 S.W.3d 174, 353 Ark. 356, 2003 Ark. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finagin-v-arkansas-development-finance-authority-ark-2003.