Fillmore & Co. v. Campbell

25 Kan. 107
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 15, 1881·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Plaintiffs in error contend that the verdict is wrong, and that no cause of action was proved. Counsel for defendants in error object to the consideration by this court of the question raised, on the ground, that the record does not [108]*108purport to contain all the evidence. The only allegations in the record referring to the evidence are: “The plaintiffs rest;” “the defendants rest.” And after these expressions it appears other evidence was presented to the trial court. Therefore the objection is well taken, as it is not apparent that the whole case is here. (Comm’rs of Brown Co. v. Roberts, 22 Kas. 762; Moody v. Arthur, 16 Kas. 419.)

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fillmore & Co. v. Campbell, 25 Kan. 107 (kan 1881).

25 Kan. 107 (Fillmore & Co. v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wilson v. Price-Raid Auditing Commission
31 Kan. 257 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1884)