Board of Comm'rs v. Roberts

22 Kan. 762
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedJuly 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 Kan. 762 (Board of Comm'rs v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Board of Comm'rs v. Roberts, 22 Kan. 762 (kan 1879).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

It is claimed in this case that the evidence does not sustain the verdict and judgment, and that the court committed error in giving and refusing instructions. As the record does not purport to contain all the evidence produced on the trial, or all of the instructions given or refused, we cannot consider the questions attempted to be raised. The record is imperfect. One,or two of the instructions of the court contained in the record state certain matters of law incorrectly, but whether they were in any way qualified or limited by other instructions, we cannot tell. From the record, we cannot say that these instructions were sufficiently mate[763]*763rial and prejudicial to cause a reversal of the judgment. All the presumptions are in favor of the judgment, and therefore, in the condition of the record, the judgment will be affirmed.. (Wilson v. Fuller, 9 Kas. 176; Bartlett v. Feeney, 11 Kas. 593; Marshall v. Shibley, 11 Kas. 114.)

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ayer v. Moon
117 P. 991 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1911)
Dawson v. Pogue
22 P. 637 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1888)
Edmondson v. Beals
27 Kan. 656 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1882)
Fillmore & Co. v. Campbell
25 Kan. 107 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Kan. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/board-of-commrs-v-roberts-kan-1879.