Filer Fibre Co. v. Commissioner

14 B.T.A. 757, 1928 BTA LEXIS 2917
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedDecember 17, 1928
DocketDocket No. 24877.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 14 B.T.A. 757 (Filer Fibre Co. v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Filer Fibre Co. v. Commissioner, 14 B.T.A. 757, 1928 BTA LEXIS 2917 (bta 1928).

Opinion

OPINION.

Siefkin:

This is a proceeding for the redetermination of a deficiency in income and profits taxes for 1920 in the amount of $2,276.97. Error is alleged as to the disallowance of certain depreciation claimed on buildings, machinery and equipment.

[758]*758The petitioner is a corporation with its office and principal place of business at Filer City, Mich. On its income and profits-tax return for 1920 it deducted $4,539.52 and $18,286.89 as depreciation on concrete buildings and machinery and equipment, respectively. In determining the deficiency involved in this proceeding the respondent disallowed $1,597.63 and $3,352.31 of the deductions for depreciation of buildings and machinery and equipment respectively.

The petitioner built its plant, which was a pulp mill and not a paper mill, and which was designed and used for the manufacture of unbleached sulphate pulp, commonly known as Kraft pulp, in 1916 and 1917, and started operations shortly after January 1, 1918. It took depreciation in 1918 and 1919 at the rate of 5 per cent on buildings and at the rate of 10 per cent on machinery and equipment. It intended to take the same rates in 1920, but instead of those rates being applied to the building and to the machinery and equipment accounts as of January 1,1918, they were applied to the accounts as reduced by the depreciation taken in 1918 and 1919. The result was that rates of only 4.6 per cent and of only 8.6 per cent were taken respectively on buildings and on machinery and equipment — straight line depreciation. The following table shows the original cost of, and depreciation taken on, buildings and machinery in 1918,1919, and 1920:

Buildings constructed in 1916 and 1917:
Cost (1918)_$50,404.73
5% depreciation 1918- 2, 520.23
No depreciation for 1916 and 1917_
Cost (1919)_ 97,567.89
5% depreciation 1919 on $95,047.66- 4, 752. 38
Cost (1920)_ 98,063.04
5% depreciation 1920 on $90,790.43_ 4, 539. 52
Amount carried on books J an. 1, 1921- 97, 567. 89
Machinery and equipment installed, 1917:
■Cost (1918)_ 120,023.82
10% depreciation 1918_ 12, 002. 38
No depreciation for 1917.
Cost (1919)_ 196,800.12
10% depreciation 1919 on $184,797.74_ 18, 479.77
Cost (1920)_213,351.13
10% depreciation 1920 on $182,808.98_ 18,286. 89
Amount carried on books Jan. 1, 1921_ 196, 800.12

The respondent allowed a rate of 4 per cent on buildings and 7 per cent on machinery and equipment, or a total of $2,941.89 on buildings and a total of $14,934.58 on machinery and equipment.

The petitioner built its plant in 1917 and 1918 after the United States had entered the World War. Because of the control by various governmental war agencies of raw materials, and because of the difficulty in obtaining good machinery, the petitioner, in the construction of its plant, was compelled to use inferior grades of [759]*759materials and inferior machinery and other equipment. As illustrative of what took place in this respect, the company was required to replace within a very short time three evaporators, six liquor tanks, and two digesters.

Because of the extraordinary demand for pulp in 1920 the company operated its plant far beyond normal capacity. Its normal capacity, as demonstrated by its operations both prior and subsequent to 1920, was about 20 tons per day. During 1920 the plant produced approximately 30 tons of pulp per day. The total production of pulp in 1918 was 6,284 tons; in 1919, 7,551 tons; and in 1920,. 9,151 tons. During all of these years the mill was operated 24 hours a day, but during the year 1920 the plant was not shut down over Sundays for repairs, it having been run continuously and repairs having been made while the plant was in operation. These repairs were not such as should have been and as are made in normal times, so that the result was much more wear and tear on the machinery and equipment in 1920 than in previous and subsequent years.

The digesters, evaporators, rotary furnaces and other machinery were constantly in operation during the year 1920, and because of such constant operation without necessary repairs being made from time to time, and because of the inferior quality of the materials entering into various parts of the machinery, a very rapid deterioration took place. The machinery was largely of special design and very expensive. The digesters, installed originally at a cost of from $8,000 to $12,000, each, did not stand up under the forced operations and developed cracks and seams. Two of the digesters finally had to be taken out entirely. The evaporators and rotary furnaces had to be rebuilt and later taken out entirely and replaced. No replacements were charged to operation or maintenance. All replacements and new construction at all times were charged to the capital account.

The plant of the company in 1920 consisted of a wood room, a digester house, a diffuser room, a boiler house, a wet machine room, and a recovery building. These buildings were all of the same general construction, consisting of steel columns and trusses, with steel reinforced floors, straight concrete foundations and straight concrete walls up to a height of about 6 feet, with brick walls above that point. The roofs over the buildings were wooden roofs over the digester house and diffuser and wet machine rooms, and asphalt and steel on the recovery building and boiler house. The roofs over the recovery building and boiler house were replaced after four years of operation on account of destruction by chemicals and moisture incident to the pulp mill operations. All of the wooden roofs had to be extensively repaired and replaced in 1928. The brick walls in the recovery building, particularly in the upper parts thereof, had to [760]*760be partly replaced in 1928. These walls were reached by fumes from chemicals used in the pulp-mill operations and deteriorate very rapidly, having a life of not to exceed 10 or 12 years. The wooden roofs were constantly subjected to heavy condensation, rapid changes from wet to dry and from heat to moisture and vice versa, resulting in rapid deterioration of materials and requiring replacement in from seven to eight years. At the time of the construction of the company’s pulp mil), it was estimated that the life of the company’s operations would not exceed 20 years, based on the available supply of pulp wood. After the war and because of foreign competition in pulp, the company found that to continue in business it had to build a paper mill, which it did in 1922.

The machinery in the wood room consisted in a general way of a large barking drum, a chipper, wire screens, conveying machinery, motors, etc. In the preparation of pulp wood it is barked in the barking drum, which creates a great strain upon the drum and repairs and replacements are necessary in the barking room almost constantly by replacing angle irons, bolts, etc. The life of a chipper, which cuts the wood into chips, is about two years.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Filer Fibre Co. v. Commissioner
14 B.T.A. 757 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 B.T.A. 757, 1928 BTA LEXIS 2917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/filer-fibre-co-v-commissioner-bta-1928.