Fildew v. Milner

109 P. 1092, 57 Or. 16
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided July 19, 1910·Published·Cited by 27 cases

Opinions

[17] Decided June 28, 1910.

On Motion to Dismiss.

[109 Pac. 1092.]

1. Opinion Per Curiam : This is a motion to dismiss an appeal on the ground that the bond therefor is insufficient. The appellant’s counsel have interposed a counter-motion for leave to file an amended undertaking.

When a party in good faith gives a notice of appeal from a judgment or decree and thereafter omits, through mistake, to file an undertaking, the appellate court may permit the performance of such act. Section 549, subd. 4, B. & C. Comp. An undertaking was given in this cause, thereby evidencing good faith, and such being the case, the motion to dismiss is denied, and leave is hereby granted to file a new undertaking within thirty days.

Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fildew v. Milner, 109 P. 1092, 57 Or. 16 (Or. 1910).

109 P. 1092 (Fildew v. Milner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilberts v. Employment Division
564 P.2d 1073 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1977)
Wagar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
556 P.2d 658 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1976)
Wells v. Wells
490 P.2d 213 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1971)
Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.
474 P.2d 746 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1970)
ROHNER ET UX v. Neville
368 P.2d 391 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1961)
Snyder v. Consolidated Highway Co.
72 P.2d 932 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1937)
Peters v. Dietrich
27 P.2d 1015 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Anderson v. Guenther
25 P.2d 146 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Phegley & Cavender v. Swender Blue Print Co.
289 P. 500 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1930)
Astoria Savings Bank v. Normand
267 P. 524 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)
E. J. Struntz Planing Mill Co. v. Paget
263 P. 389 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1927)
Herrick v. Wallace
236 P. 471 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1925)
De Golia v. Andersen
188 P. 164 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1921)
Duncan Lumber Co. v. Willapa Lumber Co.
182 P. 172 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1919)
Meyers v. Hot Lake Sanatorium Co.
161 P. 697 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)
Spores v. Maude
158 P. 169 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)
Felts v. Boyer
144 P. 420 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
Oregon Auto-Dispatch v. Cadwell
135 P. 880 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1913)
Chapman v. Multnomah County
126 P. 996 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1912)