Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Figueroa v. State

Figueroa v. State

867 So. 2d 627, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826, 2004 WL 444562
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Figueroa v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 870 So. 2d 897 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 2004·No. No. 3D04-290·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The unsigned motion for DNA Evidence Examination does not comply with rule 3.853, Fla. R.Crim. P., but instead attempts to argue ineffective assistance of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Figueroa v. State, 867 So. 2d 627, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826, 2004 WL 444562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

867 So. 2d 627 (Figueroa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.