Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Figueroa v. State

Figueroa v. State

867 So. 2d 627, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826, 2004 WL 444562
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 2004
DocketNo. 3D04-290
StatusPublished

This text of 867 So. 2d 627 (Figueroa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Figueroa v. State, 867 So. 2d 627, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826, 2004 WL 444562 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. The unsigned motion for DNA Evidence Examination does not comply with rule 3.853, Fla. R.Crim. P., but instead attempts to argue ineffective assistance of counsel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
867 So. 2d 627, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2826, 2004 WL 444562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/figueroa-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.