Field v. Burr

61 P. 665, 129 Cal. 44, 1900 Cal. LEXIS 925
California Supreme Court·Decided June 25, 1900·No. L.A. No. 650.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment for intervenor in a suit for the recovery of personal property levied upon by defendant, as sheriff, under attachment in favor of plaintiff against third party.

The findings are unusually full and explicit, but in the conclusions of law the word "plaintiff" is inadvertently used for "intervenor," which is the ground urged for reversal. (Doughertyv. Ward, 89 Cal. 81.)

We recommend that the judgment be affirmed.

Gray, C., and Haynes, C., concurred.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.

McFarland, J., Temple, J., Henshaw, J.

*Page 45

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Field v. Burr, 61 P. 665, 129 Cal. 44, 1900 Cal. LEXIS 925 (Cal. 1900).

61 P. 665 (Field v. Burr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cummings v. Columbia Pictures Corp.
47 P.2d 504 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Camacho v. Balasquide
19 P.R. 564 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1913)