Home/Supreme Court/Field Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

Field Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

382 U.S. 1009, 86 S. Ct. 614, 15 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2435
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 24, 1966
DocketNo. 661
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 382 U.S. 1009 (Field Enterprises, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Field Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 382 U.S. 1009, 86 S. Ct. 614, 15 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2435 (1966).

Opinion

Ct. Cl. Certiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Weisman
5 F.3d 417 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Robertson v. Peters (In re Weisman)
5 F.3d 417 (Ninth Circuit, 1993)
Guam Hakubotan, Inc. v. Furusawa Investment Corporation, Julale Investment Corporation, and Yasuda Shoji Kk
947 F.2d 398 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)
Thorsteinsson v. M/V Drangur
891 F.2d 1547 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
Thorsteinsson v. Drangur
891 F.2d 1547 (Eleventh Circuit, 1990)
Probasco v. Eads (In re Probasco)
839 F.2d 1352 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
18 Collier bankr.cas.2d 523, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,222 in Re William R. Probasco Joan Probasco Eddie McKinney Thelma Jo McKinney Bill J. Eads Patsy M. Eads, Debtors. William R. Probasco Joan Probasco Mid Valley Time Loan Robert C. Arnold, as Disbursing Agent Under the Plan of Reorganization v. Bill J. Eads Patsy M. Eads
839 F.2d 1352 (Ninth Circuit, 1988)
Boise Cascade Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
837 F.2d 1127 (D.C. Circuit, 1988)
Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc.
776 F.2d 281 (Federal Circuit, 1985)
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Burns
614 F. Supp. 1360 (S.D. California, 1985)
Barrier v. United States
1 Cl. Ct. 674 (Court of Claims, 1983)
Contempo Metal Furniture Co. Of California, a Calif. Corp. v. East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc., Dba Etmf Freight System
661 F.2d 761 (Ninth Circuit, 1981)
Mayview Corp., an Illinois Corporation v. Harvey B. Rodstein, an Individual and Rodac Pneumatic Tools, Inc., a California Corporation, and Rodac International Corporation, a California Corporation, Harvey B. Rodstein, an Individual, and Rodac Pneumatic Tools, Inc., a California Corporation, and Rodac International Corporation, a California Corporation, Counterplaintiffs-Appellants v. Mayview Corp., an Illinois Corporation, Leonard Shapiro, Irving Fisher, Tom Sato and Shig Nakagiri, Individuals, Astrosound, a Corporation, Astrosound, a Division of Marquette Appliance Co., a Corporation, Marquette Appliances Co., a Corporation, Autoquip Distributors, Western Skills, General Merchandising Co., Counterdefendants-Appellees
620 F.2d 1347 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
Mayview Corp. v. Rodstein
620 F.2d 1347 (Ninth Circuit, 1980)
United States v. Eugene F. House, in No. 74-1450. Appeal of Evelyn M. House in No. 74-1451
524 F.2d 1035 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Modrok v. Marshall
523 P.2d 172 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1974)
United States v. Darwin Clark Bailey
480 F.2d 518 (Fifth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
382 U.S. 1009, 86 S. Ct. 614, 15 L. Ed. 2d 525, 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/field-enterprises-inc-v-united-states-scotus-1966.