Fidelity Loan Ass'n v. Connolly

92 N.Y.S. 252
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 252 (Fidelity Loan Ass'n v. Connolly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fidelity Loan Ass'n v. Connolly, 92 N.Y.S. 252 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

It is well settled in this state that after default the mortgagor in a chattel mortgage has no further interest in, or title to or right of possession of, the mortgaged property. Leadbetter v. Leadbetter, 125 N. Y. 290, 294, 26 N. E. 265, 21 Am. St. Rep. 738. He becomes merely the bailee of the mortgagee, and replevin is the appropriate remedy. Section 139 of the municipal court act (Laws 1902, p. 1533, c. 580) forbids such an action only in case of a contract of conditional sale of personal property, a hiring of personal property when title is not to ' vest in the person hiring until the payment of a certain sum, or a chattel mortgage made to secure the purchase price of chattels. The present action does not arise upon any of the contracts specified in this section. It is the ordinary case of a chattel mortgage to secure a loan.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fidelity Loan Ass'n v. Connolly
95 N.Y.S. 576 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.Y.S. 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fidelity-loan-assn-v-connolly-nyappterm-1905.