Ficker v. Diefenbach
578 P.2d 467, 35 Or. App. 829
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided August 22, 1978·No. No. 167-559, CA 8956·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We adhere to our former opinion, Ficker v. Diefenbach, 34 Or App 241, 578 P2d 467 (1978), but modify it to the extent that the following sentence is deleted:
«* * * \ye now amplify that holding by stating that the reference to damages therein is to those damages authorized by other sections of the Act. * * *” 34 Or App at 247.
That statement was not necessary to our decision.
Petition for reconsideration granted; former opinion as modified adhered to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ficker v. Diefenbach, 578 P.2d 467, 35 Or. App. 829 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
578 P.2d 467 (Ficker v. Diefenbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Timberlee Apartments v. Able
591 P.2d 399 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)