Ficker v. Diefenbach
578 P.2d 467, 35 Or. App. 829
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedAugust 22, 1978
DocketNo. 167-559, CA 8956
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 578 P.2d 467 (Ficker v. Diefenbach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ficker v. Diefenbach, 578 P.2d 467, 35 Or. App. 829 (Or. Ct. App. 1978).
Opinion
We adhere to our former opinion, Ficker v. Diefenbach, 34 Or App 241, 578 P2d 467 (1978), but modify it to the extent that the following sentence is deleted:
«* * * \ye now amplify that holding by stating that the reference to damages therein is to those damages authorized by other sections of the Act. * * *” 34 Or App at 247.
That statement was not necessary to our decision.
Petition for reconsideration granted; former opinion as modified adhered to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Timberlee Apartments v. Able
591 P.2d 399 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
578 P.2d 467, 35 Or. App. 829, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ficker-v-diefenbach-orctapp-1978.