Ficken v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.
This text of 151 S.E. 688 (Ficken v. Southern Cotton Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. No legal duty rests upon a person to exercise any degree of care or diligence to protect another against the hazards'of a perilous situation brought about through no fault of the former. Allen v. Hixson, 111 Ga. 460 (36 S. E. 819); DeVane v. Atlanta &c. Railroad Co., 4 Ga. App. 136 (60 S. E. 1079).
2. Where one who, while sitting on a seat attached to ropes suspended from a structure, viz. a water-tank, which he is painting, faints and becomes unconscious, and his body becomes entangled in the ropes and he is suspended in the air high from the ground and in imminent danger of falling, his employer in control of the premises is, on becoming acquainted with this situation, under no legal duty to exercise any degree of care or diligence to extricate the hapjess man from his perilous condition or to render the premises safe against the influx of trespassers who come upon the premises and tamper with ropes suspended within their reach, and by so doing cause the person suspended in the air to fall to the ground and receive injuries which cause his death.
3. In a suit against the employer by the wife of the dead man to recover damages for the homicide the petition failed to set out a cause of action and was properly dismissed on demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 S.E. 688, 40 Ga. App. 841, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 727, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ficken-v-southern-cotton-oil-co-gactapp-1930.