Feurtado v. McNair

227 F. App'x 303
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 15, 2007·No. 07-6252·Unpublished·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Feurtado appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). He also appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Feurtado v. McNair, No. 3:05-cv01933-SB (D.S.C. June 16, 2006; Jan. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *304 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Feurtado v. McNair, 227 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2007).

227 F. App'x 303 (Feurtado v. McNair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
D. South Carolina, 2026
Walters v. TD Bank Corp
D. South Carolina, 2025
Cascone v. Williams
D. South Carolina, 2024
Daab v. Barlett
D. South Carolina, 2024
Johnson v. Officer Ponticello
D. South Carolina, 2024
Smith v. United States
D. South Carolina, 2024
Brown v. Newton
D. South Carolina, 2024
Hendrix v. State Officials
D. South Carolina, 2024
Untitled Case
D. South Carolina, 2023