Feurtado v. McNair
This text of 227 F. App'x 303 (Feurtado v. McNair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony Feurtado appeals the district court’s order and judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). He also appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Feurtado v. McNair, No. 3:05-cv01933-SB (D.S.C. June 16, 2006; Jan. 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *304 and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
227 F. App'x 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/feurtado-v-mcnair-ca4-2007.