Ferris v. State
183 So. 3d 1070, 2015 WL 2106340, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6793
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 2015·No. No. 1D15-1510·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004).
Petitioner is warned that any future filings which the court determines to be successive or frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a bar to further pro se filings and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections as provided in [1071]*1071section 944.279, Florida Statutes. See Fla.R. App. P. 9.410.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferris v. State, 183 So. 3d 1070, 2015 WL 2106340, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 6793 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).
183 So. 3d 1070 (Ferris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shotwell v. State
208 So. 3d 1192 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Ferris v. State
174 So. 3d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)