Ferri v. Rossetti
This text of 411 A.2d 214 (Ferri v. Rossetti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION
Appellant, Francis Ferri, filed an action in state court alleging negligence on the part of appellee, Dominick Rossetti, an attorney who represented appellant in connection with a federal grand jury investigation. It was alleged that appellee misplaced a written agreement which would have conferred immunity upon appellant against criminal prosecution by federal authorities. The tort action was dismissed by the lower court en banc in response to appellee’s preliminary objections. The Superior Court affirmed per curiam. Ferri v. Rossetti, 253 Pa.Super. 614, 384 A.2d 995 (1978). This Court agreed and affirmed. Ferri v. Rossetti, 483 Pa. 327, 396 A.2d 1193 (1979).
Subsequently, appellant’s petition to the United States Supreme Court for issuance of writ of certiorari was granted. On January 8, 1980, the United States Supreme Court remanded the matter to this Court with instructions to dispose of the case in accordance with its ruling in Ferri v. Ackerman, 444 U.S. 193, 100 S.Ct. 402, 62 L.Ed.2d 355 (1979).
[118]*118We, therefore, reverse the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County dismissing appellant’s complaint, reinstate the action and remand the cause for disposition consistent with this Court’s per curiam opinion in Ferri v. Ackerman, 488 Pa. 113, 411 A.2d 213 (1980).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
411 A.2d 214, 488 Pa. 117, 1979 Pa. LEXIS 811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferri-v-rossetti-pa-1979.