Ferrell v. Summa Health System

Ohio Supreme Court

Ferrell v. Summa Health System

858 N.E.2d 351, 112 Ohio St. 3d 84

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 27, 2006·No. No. 2005-2401·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Robinson v. Bates, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006-Ohio-6362, 857 N.E.2d 1195.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the portion of the opinion of the court of appeals relating to the application of the collateral-source rule may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Robinson v. Bates, 112 Ohio St.3d 17, 2006-Ohio-6362, 857 N.E.2d 1195.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the portion of the opinion of the court of appeals relating to the application of the collateral-source rule may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

Ferrell v. Summa Health System, 858 N.E.2d 351, 112 Ohio St. 3d 84 (Ohio 2006).

Pincite

858 N.E.2d 351 (Ferrell v. Summa Health System) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related