Ferre v. State
This text of 494 So. 2d 214 (Ferre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Maurice FERRE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Etc., Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Arthur J. England, Jr., Mitchell R. Bloomberg and Charles M. Auslander of Fine, Jacobson, Schwartz, Nash, Block and England, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Janet Reno, State Atty. for Eleventh Judicial Circuit, and Anthony C. Musto, Asst. State Atty., Miami, for respondent.
PER CURIAM.
We approve of the well-reasoned opinion of Ferre v. State, 478 So.2d 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and adopt it in its entirety.
It is so ordered.
McDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
494 So. 2d 214, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferre-v-state-fla-1986.