Ferranti v. New York City Property Clerk's Office

6 A.D.3d 178, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3714
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 2004·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbie Payne, J.), entered February 20, 2003, dismissing the petitions in petitioner’s two consolidated proceedings, as barred by res judicata, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[179] The dismissal on statute of limitations grounds of a prior petition seeking the same relief against essentially the same parties is sufficiently close to being on the merits to bar the instant proceedings on the ground of res judicata (see Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185, 194 [1981]; Marinelli Assoc, v Helmsley-Noyes Co., 265 AD2d 1, 4-5 [2000]). Petitioner’s argument about the court’s reference to “newly discovered evidence” is entirely without merit. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Williams and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferranti v. New York City Property Clerk's Office, 6 A.D.3d 178, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

6 A.D.3d 178 (Ferranti v. New York City Property Clerk's Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joseph v. Athanasopoulos
648 F.3d 58 (Second Circuit, 2011)
Joseph v. HDMJ
Second Circuit, 2011
Rapoli v. Village of Red Hook
41 A.D.3d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Partnership 92 West v. Dobrolowicz
10 Misc. 3d 23 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)