Ferranti v. New York City Property Clerk's Office

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ferranti v. New York City Property Clerk's Office

6 A.D.3d 178, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 1, 2004

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 A.D.3d 178 (Ferranti v. New York City Property Clerk's Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferranti v. New York City Property Clerk's Office, 6 A.D.3d 178, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbie Payne, J.), entered February 20, 2003, dismissing the petitions in petitioner’s two consolidated proceedings, as barred by res judicata, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[179]*179The dismissal on statute of limitations grounds of a prior petition seeking the same relief against essentially the same parties is sufficiently close to being on the merits to bar the instant proceedings on the ground of res judicata (see Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185, 194 [1981]; Marinelli Assoc, v Helmsley-Noyes Co., 265 AD2d 1, 4-5 [2000]). Petitioner’s argument about the court’s reference to “newly discovered evidence” is entirely without merit. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Williams and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Kibbie Payne, J.), entered February 20, 2003, dismissing the petitions in petitioner’s two consolidated proceedings, as barred by res judicata, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[179]*179The dismissal on statute of limitations grounds of a prior petition seeking the same relief against essentially the same parties is sufficiently close to being on the merits to bar the instant proceedings on the ground of res judicata (see Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185, 194 [1981]; Marinelli Assoc, v Helmsley-Noyes Co., 265 AD2d 1, 4-5 [2000]). Petitioner’s argument about the court’s reference to “newly discovered evidence” is entirely without merit. Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Ellerin, Williams and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.3d 178, 773 N.Y.S.2d 876, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferranti-v-new-york-city-property-clerks-office-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack