Ferrand v. DHL CO.

614 So. 2d 350, 1993 WL 33004
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 11, 1993
Docket92-CA-1758
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 350 (Ferrand v. DHL CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferrand v. DHL CO., 614 So. 2d 350, 1993 WL 33004 (La. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

614 So.2d 350 (1993)

Charles FERRAND
v.
D.H.L. COMPANY and Insurance Company of North America.

No. 92-CA-1758.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

February 11, 1993.

*351 Ammon L. Miller, Jr., New Orleans, for plaintiff/appellee.

Denis Paul Juge, Frank R. Whiteley, III, Sutherland, Juge, Horack & Dwyer, New Orleans, for defendants/appellants.

Before SCHOTT, C.J., and BARRY and PLOTKIN, JJ.

BARRY, Judge.

On July 26, 1989 Charles Ferrand, who was employed by D.H.L. Company (DHL), injured his knee and Insurance Company of North America (CIGNA) paid temporary total disability benefits of $227.61 per week until February 2, 1991. CIGNA then reduced Ferrand's payments to supplemental earnings benefits (SEB) of $107.50 per week which were terminated on October 30, 1991. Ferrand's suit resulted in a judgment for $227.21 per week temporary total benefits plus interest minus compensation paid.

DHL and CIGNA submit four assignments of error:

(1) Ferrand is not temporarily totally disabled;
(2) Ferrand was a part-time employee;
(3) DHL and CIGNA are entitled to a credit for overpayment of compensation benefits;
(4) Ferrand has an earning capacity in excess of pre-accident wages.

Ferrand testified that he graduated from high school in 1975 and attended Southern University for three years where he majored in political science. He left college, got married, then worked as an agent for an insurance company and at West Jefferson Hospital as a psychiatric technician. His work at the hospital was to document the behavior patterns of patients and provide written reports to the physicians.

Ferrand worked for DHL as a courier guard for approximately six years and earned $9.75 per hour. He stated that he was hired as a part-time employee but eventually worked full-time. He said that in January 1989 (before his accident) DHL started scheduling couriers to less than 40 hours per week, and he admitted that he worked 96.5 hours during the month preceding his accident.

Ferrand testified that work is available which he is capable of performing. He stated that he could "possibly" work eight hours a day in a sitting position.

Ferrand said that his treating physician, Dr. Murphy, released him to light duty employment in early 1991 and recommended that he seek a job as a dispatcher. Ferrand stated that DHL did not offer him a dispatcher's job. He applied (unsuccessfully) for at least ten jobs after knee surgery and claims he was not hired because of the injury and the compensation claim.

*352 Dr. Murphy, an orthopedic surgeon, stated that he reported to CIGNA on July 31, 1990 that Ferrand could return to light duty as a dispatcher. The doctor testified that Ferrand was employable at the time of the deposition, but would never fully recover and his condition may deteriorate. Dr. Murphy reiterated that Ferrand was capable of sedentary to light duty employment and is best suited for a desk job that requires no climbing, lifting heavy objects or standing for long periods of time.

Joseph Schoenbachler, a manager for DHL, testified that Ferrand was hired as a part-time employee but also worked full-time. In January 1989 DHL's policy changed and couriers were only scheduled to work part-time. DHL classified Ferrand as a regular part-time employee. Schoenbachler confirmed that during the month before the accident Ferrand worked 96.5 hours at $9.75 per hour. He asked a vocational specialist for Ferrand to work as a dispatcher but Ferrand could not be contacted. He said that position was no longer available.

Becky Riecke, a rehabilitation specialist hired by CIGNA, testified that in March 1990 she located two dispatcher jobs and one telephone sales job which paid between $3.80 and $6.00 per hour. That information was forwarded to Ferrand by certified mail but he did not reply.

In August 1991 Riecke performed another labor market survey which identified seven positions available within Ferrand's capabilities. Those jobs paid between $4.92 and $8.00 per hour. A third job survey in October 1991 identified five employment opportunities paying between $4.25 and $6.00 per hour.

Riecke testified that an analysis of each position was submitted to Dr. Murphy and he approved 11 of the 15 jobs and needed additional information on the other positions.

Riecke explained to prospective employers that Ferrand had an on-the-job knee injury and physical restrictions. She told potential employers that Ferrand was receiving compensation, but had been released to perform light duty employment.

ANALYSIS

A. Temporary Total Disability

La.R.S. 23:1221(1) establishes when "temporary total" disability benefits are payable and states in part:

(1) Temporary total.
(a) For any injury producing temporary total disability of an employee to engage in any self-employment or occupation for wages, whether or not the same or a similar occupation as that in which the employee was customarily engaged when injured, and whether or not an occupation for which the employee at the time of injury was particularly fitted by reason of education, training, or experience, sixty-six and two-thirds percent of wages during the period of such disability.
* * * * * *
(c) For purposes of Subparagraph (1)(a) of this Paragraph, whenever the employee is not engaged in any employment or self-employment as described in Subparagraph (1)(b) of this Paragraph, compensation for temporary total disability shall be awarded only if the employee proves by clear and convincing evidence unaided by any presumption of disability, that the employee is physically unable to engage in any employment or self-employment, regardless of the nature or character of the employment or self-employment, including but not limited to any and all odd-lot employment, sheltered employment, or employment while working in pain, notwithstanding the location or availability of any such employment or self-employment. (Emphasis added).

To receive temporary total disability benefits a claimant must prove his inability to engage in any gainful occupation, whether or not it is the same type of work in which the employee was engaged at the time of injury. Sharpless v. Jo Ellen Smith Medical Center, 557 So.2d 287, 288 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990), writ denied 558 So.2d 606 (La.1990); McClendon v. Schwegmann Giant Supermarkets, 561 *353 So.2d 959, 960 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990). Although compensation cases are liberally construed in favor of an employee, the burden of proof is by a preponderance of the evidence and with the same legal certainty as in any civil case. Sharpless, 557 So.2d at 288.

Ferrand did not introduce evidence that his injury prevented him from engaging in any employment. In fact he conceded that he could possibly do some work. Dr. Murphy stated as early as July 1990 that Ferrand could handle light duty employment.

Ferrand cites Coalgrove v. Spider Staging Sales Company, 530 So.2d 655, 657 (La.App. 4th Cir.1988) for the proposition that "[a]n employee who can only work in pain is entitled to a temporary total disability award." However, in Coalgrove the treating physician testified that the plaintiff was unable to work in any type of employment. Ferrand's physician testified that he was capable of light duty employment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mitchell v. ARTCRETE, INC.
24 So. 3d 1000 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
Dexter Mitchell v. Artcrete, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009
Reed v. Mid-States Wood Preservers, Inc.
999 So. 2d 189 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2008)
Monceaux v. R & R CONST., INC.
919 So. 2d 795 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005)
Donovan Monceaux v. R & R Construction, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2005
Hebert v. Terrebonne Parish School Bd.
879 So. 2d 222 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2004)
Bolyer v. Epic Packaging
740 So. 2d 739 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Crews v. Alexas Corp.
731 So. 2d 338 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
Fontenot v. Trans Gulf, Inc.
664 So. 2d 1238 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)
Sampsell v. B & I Welding Serv. & Cons.
638 So. 2d 477 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
Schmitt v. City of New Orleans
632 So. 2d 367 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 350, 1993 WL 33004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrand-v-dhl-co-lactapp-1993.