Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 11, 2014·No. 04-13-00187-CR·Published

Opinion

The State of

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 11, 2014

No. 04-13-00187-CR

Fernando RODRIGUEZ Jr., Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CRN-531-D3 Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting this court to reconsider his request for oral argument. Appellant is represented by Fausto Sosa. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of August, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State (Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)