Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 9, 2014·No. 04-13-00187-CR·Published

Opinion

The State of TexasAppellee

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 9, 2014

No. 04-13-00187-CR

Fernando RODRIGUEZ Jr., Appellant/s

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-CRN-531-D3 , Judge Presiding

ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se motion requesting permission to supplement the appellant’s brief filed by his attorney by allowing appellant the right to limited hybrid representation. Appellant’s motion is DENIED. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981).

_________________________________ Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 9th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State (Fernando Rodriguez Jr. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rudd v. State
616 S.W.2d 623 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1981)