Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, Warden

366 F.3d 430, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7788, 2004 WL 934989
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 20, 2004·No. 01-3875·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinion

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service qualified to participate have voted for rehearing of this ease en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

“The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.”

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Thursday, May 20, 2004, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, June 21, 2004. The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, Warden, 366 F.3d 430, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 7788, 2004 WL 934989 (6th Cir. 2004).

366 F.3d 430 (Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, Warden
426 F.3d 339 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Lopez v. Wilson
Sixth Circuit, 2005
Williams v. Wilson
149 F. App'x 342 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Kenneth T. Richey v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
395 F.3d 660 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Richey v. Mitchell
Sixth Circuit, 2005
Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, Warden
380 F.3d 932 (Sixth Circuit, 2004)