Fernandez v. State

859 So. 2d 551, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17631, 2003 WL 22717911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 786 So. 2d 38
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2003·No. No. 4D02-1269·Published

Opinion

FARMER, C.J.

We affirm in spite of defendant’s attack on the validity of the Three-Strike Violent Felony Offender Act, chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida. We have resolved the issue of a single subject violation in favor of the constitutionality of the Act. Hernandez-Molina v. State, No. 03-215, 860 So.2d 483, 2003 WL 22715773 (Fla. 4th DCA Nov. 19, 2003). In affirming this case, we also certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), as we did in Hernandez-Molina.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fernandez v. State, 859 So. 2d 551, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17631, 2003 WL 22717911 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

859 So. 2d 551 (Fernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez-Molina v. State
860 So. 2d 483 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)