Fernandez v. State
825 So. 2d 1061, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13454, 2002 WL 31059791
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fernandez v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 786 So. 2d 38 →
Opinion
After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied the defendant’s claim for post-conviction relief on the asserted ground of ineffectiveness of trial counsel. The order is affirmed on the basis of the trial court’s comprehensive, well-reasoned and well-supported order. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Anderson v. State, 467 So.2d 781 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), pet. for review dismissed, 475 So.2d 693 (Fla.1985).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fernandez v. State, 825 So. 2d 1061, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13454, 2002 WL 31059791 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
825 So. 2d 1061 (Fernandez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Anderson v. State
467 So. 2d 781 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)