Ferguson v. Wood
23 Tex. 177
Opinion
We are of opinion that the plea of Andrew F. Smith, one of the defendants in the court below, was not a good plea of non est factum, because it did not deny the execution of the note sued on. And if the plea could be held good as a plea in abatement, it came too late after an answer to the merits. There was, therefore, no error in the judgment of the court below, sustaining the exceptions to the plea. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferguson v. Wood, 23 Tex. 177 (Tex. 1859).
23 Tex. 177 (Ferguson v. Wood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McVeigh v. International Travelers Assur. Co.
101 S.W.2d 644 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
City Water Works v. White
61 Tex. 536 (Texas Supreme Court, 1884)