Ferguson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

218 Md. 644
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 13, 1958·No. H. C. No. 9·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER Curiam.

In a petition for leave to appeal from the denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus, the applicant makes but one contention, i. e., that a confession was obtained from him by “unorthodox and unfair methods used by the police officers.” The voluntary nature of a confession may be raised and contested at the trial of a defendant or upon appeal, but cannot form the basis for a writ of habeas corpus. Johnson v. Warden, 212 Md. 652; Eberle v. Warden, 209 Md. 657.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 218 Md. 644 (Md. 1958).

218 Md. 644 (Ferguson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferguson v. Warden
145 A.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Whitley v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
158 A.2d 905 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1978)
Elliott v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
238 F. Supp. 416 (D. Maryland, 1965)