Ferguson v. Warden

145 A.2d 772, 218 Md. 644
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedSeptember 9, 2001
Docket[H.C. No. 9, September Term, 1958.]
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 145 A.2d 772 (Ferguson v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. Warden, 145 A.2d 772, 218 Md. 644 (Md. 2001).

Opinion

218 Md. 644 (1958)
145 A.2d 772

FERGUSON
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION

[H.C. No. 9, September Term, 1958.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided November 13, 1958.

*645 Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

In a petition for leave to appeal from the denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus, the applicant makes but one contention, i.e., that a confession was obtained from him by "unorthodox and unfair methods used by the police officers." The voluntary nature of a confession may be raised and contested at the trial of a defendant or upon appeal, but cannot form the basis for a writ of habeas corpus. Johnson v. Warden, 212 Md. 652; Eberle v. Warden, 209 Md. 657.

Application denied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Whitley v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
158 A.2d 905 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1978)
Elliott v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
238 F. Supp. 416 (D. Maryland, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
145 A.2d 772, 218 Md. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-warden-md-2001.