Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Ferguson v. State

Ferguson v. State

744 So. 2d 558, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14591, 1999 WL 993086
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ferguson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 697 So. 2d 979 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 3, 1999·No. No. 99-90·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leaving aside any question of procedural bar, the order denying the petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed on the authority of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.140(g), which provides: “No objection to an information on the ground that it was not signed or verified, as herein provided, shall be entertained after the defendant pleads to the merits.” See also Byrd v. State, 730 So.2d 382, 383 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Colson v. State, 717 So.2d 554, 555 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Montanez v. State, 630 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Morffy v. State, 534 So.2d 733, 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Holt v. State, 516 So.2d 25

[559]*559(Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Carey v. State, 349 So.2d 820, 822 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. State, 744 So. 2d 558, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14591, 1999 WL 993086 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

744 So. 2d 558 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Montanez v. State
630 So. 2d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Carey v. State
349 So. 2d 820 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)
Holt v. State
516 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Colson v. State
717 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Byrd v. State
730 So. 2d 382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Morffy v. State
534 So. 2d 733 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)