Ferguson v. State

814 So. 2d 1120, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4290, 2002 WL 491850
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ferguson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 804 So. 2d 411
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 3, 2002·No. No. 4D00-4712·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Issue I, see Kiddy v. State, 378 So.2d 1332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Issue II, see Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996); Geibel v. State, 795 So.2d 285 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2001). Issue III, see Murphy v. International Robotic Sys., Inc., 766 So.2d 1010, 1028 (Fla.2000).

GUNTHER, FARMER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferguson v. State, 814 So. 2d 1120, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4290, 2002 WL 491850 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

814 So. 2d 1120 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.
766 So. 2d 1010 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Kiddy v. State
378 So. 2d 1332 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Geibel v. State
795 So. 2d 285 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)