Ferguson v. State
669 So. 2d 1148, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2846, 1996 WL 124701
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 20, 1996·No. No. 95-4180·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief. While the trial court found the motion to be untimely, which we find it was not, a review of the record proves that the motion was a successive Rule 3.850 motion and that the points raised in this second motion were either raised on direct appeal, or could have been, or were raised in the first motion for relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferguson v. State, 669 So. 2d 1148, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 2846, 1996 WL 124701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
669 So. 2d 1148 (Ferguson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Glendon v. State
669 So. 2d 1148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)